The Safety and Efficacy of Aspiration Thrombectomy by Small Bore Aspiration Catheter for Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO)

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not demonstrated the efficacy of me-chanical thrombectomy (MT) for medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), partly due to device selection bias. Notably, small-bore aspiration catheters were not evaluated. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique) approach using small-bore aspiration catheters as a first-line treatment for MeVO. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients who underwent MT for MeVO between March 2023 and April 2025. Patients were categorized based on the initial thrombectomy technique: ADAPT versus stent retriever (SR) or combined ap-proaches. The primary efficacy outcome was successful reperfusion, defined by the ex-panded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of device-related adverse events. Results: A total of 54 consecutive MeVO cases were identified, comprising 9 cases treated with ADAPT (with small-bore aspiration catheters used in 89% of these) and 45 cases treated with stent retriever or combined techniques. Successful reperfusion (eTICI ≥2b50) was achieved in 100% of the ADAPT group and eTICI ≥2b67 in 77.8%. The ADAPT group showed a significantly higher rate of eTICI ≥2b50 (p < 0.05) and a lower incidence of device-related complications (odds ratio: 1.82 × 10⁻⁹; p = 0.029) compared to the SR/combined group. Conclusions: The ADAPT using small-bore aspiration catheters demonstrated high reperfusion success and a lower risk of device-related complications, suggesting it may serve as an effective first-line strategy for MeVO treatment.

Article activity feed