Interobserver Agreement in Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicentre Study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is a high-affinity folate transporter overexpressed in various epithelial malignancies, particularly high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Given its restricted expression in normal tissues and accessibility in tumors, FRα is an emerging therapeutic target. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the standard method for FRα assessment; however, interpretation is semi-quantitative and prone to interobserver variability. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement among 12 pathologists in the IHC assessment of FRα in ovarian cancer, focusing on internal control adequacy, staining intensity, and the percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Methods: Thirty-seven high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cases were stained using the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx Assay. A reference panel of four expert pathologists established consensus diagnoses. Twelve pathologists independently assessed the slides, recording internal control adequacy, staining intensity (positive vs negative), and percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Interobserver agreement was measured using Fleiss’ kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Agreement on internal control adequacy was almost perfect (κ = 0.84). Substantial agreement was observed for staining intensity (κ = 0.76), while percentage estimation showed excellent concordance (ICC = 0.89). Discrepancies were primarily confined to borderline cases (65–85% positivity) and tumors with intermediate staining, reflecting interpretive challenges near clinical decision thresholds. Conclusion: Pathologists demonstrated high reproducibility in FRα IHC assessment, particularly in estimating percentage positivity and control adequacy. These findings support the clinical utility of FRα IHC but underscore the need for standardized scoring criteria and potential integration of digital tools to enhance consistency, especially in borderline cases.