A Theoretical Framework for Quantifying Tumour Resistance to Standardized Treatments: A Novel Rudimentary Scalar Mathematical Model with Implications for Breast Cancer Prognosis and Treatment.
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background: In the complex landscape of cancer treatment challenges, personalized therapeutic strategies have gained significant importance. This study focuses on addressing the limitations of cytotoxic drugs by introducing a novel graphical and scalar model that establishes a connection between tumour biology, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in breast cancer. The central hypothesis posits that the unique biological characteristics of an individual tumour plays a crucial role in determining the response to therapy and overall survival. Results: The model evaluates past treatments and outcomes, utilizing basic mathematical expressions to link tumour biology, treatment strategies and individualized survival projections. A key element of the model is the patient-specific constant, Kc, which serves as an indicator of an individual's distinct response to treatment. The abstract highlights that a high Kc implies a greater likelihood of benefit from the administered chemotherapy, while a low Kc suggests the opposite. The findings underscore a crucial revelation: the growth dynamics of a tumour, regardless of cell quantity, holds comparable significance in determining outcomes. This is exemplified by associating different tumour scenarios with specific stage classifications and tumour proliferation index [Ki67] scores. In essence, the model reveals a pivotal insight: the growth dynamics of a tumour, whether comprising 50% of 2 billion cells or 1% of 100 billion cells, wield comparable significance in determining the ultimate outcome. This distinction is illustrated by associating the former with stage a stage I tumour featuring a [Ki67] score of 4 and latter with a stage IV tumour exhibiting a [Ki67] of 1. The sensitivity, specificity, AUC of ROC curve are 93.65, 87.5 and 0.82 respectively suggesting the model is fit for purpose. Conclusion: The model reveals that 50% of 2 billion tumour cells and 1% of 100 billion tumour cells in proliferation phase have comparable impacts on outcomes, contingent upon their respective stage and [Ki67] scores. The model emphasizes the critical threshold above or below which the scale tips against or towards better survival.