Superior Analytical Specificity of APTIMA mRNA HPV Testing over DNA Assays in a Resource-Limited South African Setting

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in sub-Saharan Africa, where screening access is limited. It is mainly caused by persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection, making HPV testing in screening programs imperative. The widely used DNA-based assays cannot distinguish transient from active infections, thus reducing specificity and risking overtreatment. In contrast, mRNA-based assays like APTIMA® detect E6/E7 transcripts, markers of active, likely persistent infections and improve clinical relevance. This cross-sectional study compared mRNA and DNA assay performance and characterized circulating HPV genotypes in a South African population to inform screening approaches in resource-limited settings. 527 cervical samples collected from women at a South African tertiary hospital were tested for HPV infections using two DNA assays (Abbott RealTime High-Risk HPV, Seegene Allplex™ II HPV28) and one mRNA assay (APTIMA® HPV). APTIMA® had the highest specificity (86.2%) and sensitivity (89.9%), outperforming Seegene (81.6%, 82.3%) and demonstrating stronger agreement with Abbott (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.80 vs. 0.70). ROC analysis confirmed APTIMA’s improved discrimination (AUC 0.8804 vs. 0.8681). Although Seegene detected more infections, many were likely transient and clinically insignificant. Findings support mRNA-based testing to better target high-risk women and reduce unnecessary interventions in resource-limited, high-burden settings.

Article activity feed