Pseudogenization of the Chaperonin System in ‘<em>Candidatus</em> Phytoplasma pruni’ Reveals Insights into the Role of GroEL/Cpn60 in Phytopathogenic Mollicutes

GroE is a chaperonin folding system consisting of GroEL (Cpn60, a 60 kDa chaperonin), and the smaller co-chaperonin GroES (Cpn10). Many “client” proteins require GroE to fold properly, including several that are essential for cell viability. Unsurprisingly then, GroE is found in nearly all bacteria and eukaryotes. Mollicutes are the only microorganisms that lack GroE in almost all cases. Only two clades of Mollicutes have retained the ancestral GroE system, or perhaps reacquired one; these exceptions include the family Acholeplasmataceae (consisting of the genera Acholeplasma and Phytoplasma). The role of GroEL in these “exceptional” Mollicutes is a source of speculation, given how many non-canonical “moonlighting” roles have been ascribed to this protein. GroEL has been suggested to play a role in pathogenesis in plant and animal pathogenic Mollicutes, by binding to host cells and facilitating invasion. However, in one further layer of exception, the phytopathogenic taxon ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pruni’ (ribosomal group 16SrIII), was reported to lack a GroE system. This study confirms the lack of a functional GroE system in 16SrIII by providing two new, high quality, non-fragmented genome assemblies, as well as a thorough survey of other 16SrIII genomes for genes encoding GroEL/GroES, including those that may not resemble phytoplasma groEL (ie. acquired by horizontal gene transfer, HGT). We discuss the implications of a clearly phytopathogenic, invasive group of Mollicutes that nevertheless lacks GroE, in light of the presumed role of GroEL for these microorganisms. We determined that three groups of genomes of 16SrIII contain short, non-functional groEL pseudogenes, while most of the reported genomes lack any semblance of a GroE system. Examination of the new assemblies allowed us to rule out HGT as a means of GroE acquisition.