Carob-Thyme Intercropping Systems Can Improve Yield Efficiency and Environmental Footprint Compared to Conservation Tillage

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Living mulch intercropping systems are considered as nature-based solutions of low environmental footprint for combating weeds, improving biodiversity and agroecosystem sustainability. In drylands, however, they may increase intra/inter-specific competition for water, reducing crop productivity. We tested conservation tillage carob plots with and without irrigation (TLGirr; TLGdry) vs. rainfed intercropping systems of carob and (i) thyme (Thymbra capitata; T-System) or (ii) clover (Trifolium squarrosum; C-System), strategically planted on the south (sun) exposed soil side (SES) of carobs, to reduce soil temperature/evaporation. Carob water relations, productivity and environmental footprints were examined for three years under semi-arid low-weed competition (SKR) and arid high-weed competition (VRY) conditions in Cyprus. Carob yield efficiency (kg/m3) in SKR, was >27% higher for the T-System (p<0.05; SES cover ca. 85%; year-3), matching higher leaf-water content (p <0.001) compared to TLGdry. The T-System reached 28% and 56% of TLGirr yields during very dry and normal rainfall years; TLGdry yields approached zero. For VRY, no negative impacts on carob leaf-water, at 25% SES cover, were found. SKR’s C-System, improved leaf-water content (p<0.05) for only one year. The T-System also outperformed TLGirr and TLGdry in terms of reducing irrigation needs and energy consumption, breaking new grounds for dryland agroforestry.

Article activity feed