Cultural Dimensions and International Human Resources Management: A conceptual Framework Analysis
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose: This conceptual study examines the theoretical relationship between Hofstede's cultural dimensions framework and International Human Resource Management (IHRM) practice effectiveness in multinational enterprises. The research addresses the critical gap between cultural theory and practical implementation in global HR management. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a systematic literature synthesis approach, analyzing peer-reviewed research across cultural dimensions and IHRM domains. The conceptual analysis integrates findings from Hofstede's cultural research, IHRM integration models, and cross-cultural organizational behavior studies to develop theoretical propositions and implementation frameworks.Findings: The analysis reveals that power distance and individualism/collectivism are the most influential cultural dimensions affecting HR practice effectiveness, with performance management emerging as the most culturally sensitive function. The study demonstrates that cultural dimensions create systematic expectations for organizational practices, requiring adaptive approaches across recruitment, compensation, training, and employee relations. Industry analysis indicates that knowledge-intensive sectors show higher cultural adaptation requirements than manufacturing or operational industries. Research limitations/implications: The study's conceptual nature limits empirical validation, and its focus on Hofstede's framework may not capture all aspects of cultural variation. The analysis reflects potential Western organizational bias and treats cultural dimensions as relatively static constructs.Practical implications: The research provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for IHRM practitioners, including a five-phase implementation model spanning cultural assessment, strategic design, pilot implementation, full deployment, and continuous evaluation. The framework enables systematic cultural adaptation while maintaining organizational coherence across global operations. Originality/value: This study contributes an integrated theoretical framework that positions cultural dimensions as moderating variables between HR practices and organizational outcomes. It offers novel implementation guidelines for culturally responsive HR practices and identifies specific adaptation requirements across industries and functional areas, bridging the gap between cultural theory and IHRM practice.