Prognostic Value of Four CT-Based Hemorrhage Markers: A Single-Center ICH Study (2017–2023)

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe stroke subtype characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Early hematoma expansion (HE) predicts poor outcomes, yet non-contrast CT (NCCT) markers that can be readily assessed in clinical practice remain underutilized. We evaluated four NCCT signs - Blend Sign (BS), Black Hole Sign (BHS), Irregular Shape (IRS), and Satellite Sign (SS) - and introduced a composite score (SUM_BBIS) to determine their association with key clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2023, we retrospectively examined 602 consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH at a single tertiary center; 404 met inclusion criteria, each un-dergoing baseline and follow-up NCCT. We identified BS, BHS, IRS, and SS on the initial scan and computed SUM_BBIS (range 0–4). Hematoma progression was defined as a volume increase >33% or >6 mL. Primary outcomes included the frequency of NCCT signs, hematoma expansion, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary analyses explored sign prevalence by hemorrhage volume, lo-cation, intraventricular extension, and comorbidities. Results: Of the 404 patients analyzed (mean SUM_BBIS=1.25), IRS was most frequent (59.4%), fol-lowed by SS (34.4%), BHS (30.9%), and BS (15.1%). Higher SUM_BBIS correlated with larger he-matomas, deep or brainstem locations, and comorbidities such as warfarin use, chronic kidney disease, or thrombocytopenia. Hematoma expansion occurred more often in those with at least one sign; BHS had the strongest association (56.2% in expanding vs. 23.8% in non-expanding hemor-rhages, p< 0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with a greater number of signs: decedents had a mean SUM_BBIS of 1.95 compared to 0.93 for survivors (p< 0.001). Each sign was markedly more prevalent in non-survivors, with BHS again showing the largest difference (66.4% vs. 15.4%). Surgical intervention was more closely related to clinical and vol-umetric factors rather than the presence of NCCT markers. Conclusions: Four NCCT signs - Blend Sign, Black Hole Sign, Irregular Shape, and Satellite Sign—were significantly linked to increased hematoma expansion and in-hospital mortality. The Black Hole Sign proved to be the most potent single predictor of expansion, while multiple co-existing signs further elevated the risk of poor outcome. Incorporating these NCCT markers into routine acute ICH assessments may allow earlier identification of high-risk patients and more timely therapeutic intervention.

Article activity feed