Diagnostic Performance of Doppler Ultrasound for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis evaluated the performance of Doppler ultrasound (DUS) for diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA) and its ability to distinguish complicated (CAA) from non-complicated acute appendicitis (NCAA). The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025641841), and a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid. Twenty-one studies were included. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Continuous quantitative parameters were synthesized using random-effects models (REML) while diagnostic performance data were analyzed through hierarchical models. For Spectral Doppler parameters, PSV showed a pooled sensitivity of 94% [89–97] and specificity of 87% [71–95], while RI showed a pooled sensitivity of 81% [68–89] and specificity of 88% [73–95]. Color Doppler (CD) achieved a pooled sensitivity of 82% [70–90], specificity of 97% [92–99], and AUC of 0.97 [0.95–0.98], with potential evidence of small-study effects (Deeks’ test p = 0.08). Evidence for discriminating CAA from NCAA was limited and heterogeneous. Although DUS—particularly CD and SD—shows encouraging diagnostic potential for AA, the presence of moderate heterogeneity, retrospective study designs, potential small-study effects (CD), and significant spectrum bias suggests that its performance is probably overestimated. Nevertheless, the consistently high accuracy estimates across multiple modalities, together with its radiation-free nature and broad availability, highlight DUS as a highly attractive complementary imaging option. Therefore, while conclusions must be interpreted cautiously until validated by large, prospective, multicenter studies with standardized thresholds and imaging protocols, our findings support DUS as a promising diagnostic tool for AA assessment, particularly in pediatric and radiation-sensitive populations, provided that the cecal appendix is adequately visualized.