CT Evaluation of Hematuria in Adults Younger than 50 Years in Military Service: Is Contrast-Enhanced Phase Needed?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist on the comparative diagnostic value of CT urography (CTU) versus unenhanced CT in evaluating the upper urinary tract in young adults (<50 years) with hematuria in active military service. This population may face an increased risk of urinary tract malignancies due to occupational exposures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 277 consecutive Israel Defense Forces personnel under 50 years old with new-onset hematuria referred for CT evaluation between 2011 and 2020. Two experienced radiologists first interpreted unenhanced CT images, followed by a review of contrast-enhanced phases. Findings were classified based on their detectability on unenhanced CT and whether contrast phases were required. Results: Of the 277 patients, 270 had microscopic hematuria and 7 had macroscopic hematuria. Imaging was normal in 158 cases. Among 119 patients (43%) with positive findings, 46 (16.6%) had clinically significant findings requiring follow-up or treatment. Of these, 42 (91%) were detectable on unenhanced CT alone. Contrast phases were requested in 15 cases (5.4%) and revealed additional benign findings. No urinary tract malignancies were identified. Conclusions: Unenhanced CT may be sufficient for evaluating new-onset hematuria in adults under 50, including active military personnel, minimizing the need for contrast administration.

Article activity feed