The Prognostic Value of Tumor Fibrosis in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Pooled Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden, with liver metastases representing a key prognostic factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has improved outcomes in metastatic CRC (mCRC), and tumor regression is commonly assessed using the Rubbia-Brandt classification. The Poultsides classification defines ≥40% fibrosis as an independent prognostic factor, particularly in patients treated with cetuximab (45.71%). However, the predictive value of this threshold remains under debate, warranting further investigation. METHODS: This study evaluates the extent of fibrosis (≥40%) induced by NAC plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy versus NAC plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in mCRC patients. It also examines the prognostic relevance of the Poultsides and Rubbia-Brandt classifications. A total of 108 patients undergoing liver resection for CRC metastases were included. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and R software to compare fibrosis rates and survival outcomes. RESULTS: From September 2005 to January 2023, 108 patients were analyzed: 54 received chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR (Cohort 1) and 54 received chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF (Cohort 2). Fibrosis was significantly higher in Cohort 1 (median 40.0%, IQR: 25.4–53.2) than in Cohort 2 (median 20.6%, IQR: 8.07–36.9), p< 0.001. Overall survival was better in Cohort 2 (p=0.003), with a median follow-up of 41.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-EGFR therapy is associated with greater fibrosis than anti-VEGF, despite similar survival outcomes. The Poultsides classification may be a useful prognostic tool for resected liver metastases in mCRC.

Article activity feed