Integrating Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer-Associated Tumor Suppressor Gene Status to Refine Prognosis and Predict Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitors Response in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: Alterations in Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer-Associated Tumor Suppressor Genes (AVPC-TSG: TP53, RB1, PTEN) are related with androgen insensitivity and aggres-sive disease. However, their prognostic and predictive role in metastatic hor-mone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear. This single-center retrospective study assesses the value of AVPC-TSG alterations in re-fining prognosis and predicting the response to androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) in mHSPC. Patients and Methods: We included 158 patients with genomic tumor sequencing under-going treatment for mHSPC between 2013 and 2023. We compared patients with AVPC-TSGalt tumors (≥1 alteration in TP53, RB1, or PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway genes) to those with AVPC-TSGwt tumors (i.e. without alterations in AVPC-TSG). Cox analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: AVPC-TSGwt status was associated with improved PFS and OS in both univari-ate and multivariate (MV) analyses (MV PFS: HR 0.58, 95%CI:0.38-0.89, p=0.012; MV OS: HR 0.48, 95%CI:0.26- 0.91, p=0.025). AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients seemed to derive no PFS benefit from ARPI addition (PFS: HR 1.13, 95%CI: (0.58-2.19), p=0.721), while AVPC-TSGwt mHSPC patients did (PFS: HR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28-0.93 p=0.029). Integrating AVPC-TSG status with CHAARTED volume criteria we identified three distinct sub-groups: "good-risk" (AVPC-TSGwt low-volume), "intermediate-risk" (either AVPC-TSGalt low-volume or AVPC-TSGwt high-volume), and "poor-risk" (AVPC-TSGalt high-volume) with median PFS of 46.8, 28.2, and 15.7 months, respectively. Only the "intermediate-risk" subgroup seemed to derive PFS benefit from ARPI addition (HR 0.36, 95%CI:0.19-0.70, p=0.002). Conclusions: AVPC-TSG status assessment refines prognosis and may predict PFS bene-fits from ARPI in mHSPC. AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients should be considered for clini-cal trials as they may not benefit from current standard approaches.

Article activity feed