Evaluating 3D Reconstruction: A Side-by-Side Comparison of NeRF and Gaussian Splatting Under Various Filming Techniques

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) for 3D reconstruction under various filming techniques. High-quality 3D models are essential in a range of applications, from forensic investigations to cultural heritage preservation, architecture, and robotics, where detail accuracy and minimal noise are critical. Leveraging continuous video footage captured with a stabilized full-frame camera setup, this research examines both algorithms across indoor and outdoor environments using consistent datasets. Key assessment criteria include reconstruction noise, detail preservation, and processing time. The results reveal that while both approaches generate high-fidelity reconstructions, 3DGS consistently outperforms NeRF in computational efficiency and noise reduction. These insights provide valuable guidance for selecting suitable reconstruction techniques across different professional domains.

Article activity feed