A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Infant Mortality among Children with Congenital Anomalies

Read the full article

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines infant mortality as the death of a child before reaching one year of age. The infant mortality rate (IMR) specifically refers to the number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births within a given year. Congenital anomalies contribute significantly to health service expenditure worldwide although the costs may vary across low-middle-income and high-income countries. MethodsA systematic methodology was developed and published in PROSPERO as part of a wide-angled evidence synthesis comprising of multiple research questions surrounding the prevalence of CA related mortality. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following a pooled dataset was finalised. ResultsA total of 75 studies, encompassing 21,878 patients, reported on infant mortality associated with congenital anomalies. The pooled mortality rate was found to be 12% (95% CI: 10%-15%). High heterogeneity was observed, with an I² value of 94% and a p-value < 0.01. T wo studies, including 112 patients, reported mortality rates among individuals with congenital aortic coarctation. The pooled mortality rate was 5% (95% CI: 2%-10%). Statistical analysis showed very low heterogeneity, with I² = 0% and a p-value of 0.71. Conclusion Evidence-based approaches may support optimal ways to report infant mortality and complications linked to congenital anomalies as well as causation-correlation links. Living-synthesis of data could support improved clinical, scientific and patient-reported outcomes that is representative of all ethnicities and races.

Article activity feed