AI-Augmented Point of Care Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Can Novices Perform a “Basic Echo” to Estimate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in This Acute-Care Setting?

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Echocardiography is crucial to understanding cardiac function in the In-tensive Care Unit (ICU), often by measuring the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Traditionally measures of LVEF are completed as part of comprehensive ex-amination by an expert sonographer or cardiologist, but front-line practitioners in-creasingly perform focused point-of-care estimates of LVEF while managing life-threatening illness. The two main echocardiographic windows used to grossly es-timate LVEF are parasternal and apical windows. Artificial intelligence (AI) algo-rithms have recently been developed to assist non-experts in obtaining and interpret-ing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) echo images. We tested the feasibility, accuracy and reliability of novice users estimating LVEF using POCUS-AI echo. Methods: A total of 30 novice users (most never holding an ultrasound probe before) received 2 hours of instruction, then scanned ICU patients (10 patients, 80 scans) using the Exo Iris POCUS probe with AI guidance tool. They were permitted up to 5 minutes at-tempting parasternal long axis (PLAX) and apical 4 chamber (A4C) views. AI-reported LVEF results from these scans were compared to gold-standard LVEF obtained by an expert echo sonographer. To further assess accuracy, this so-nographer also scanned another 65 patients using Exo Iris POCUS-AI vs. conventional protocol. Results: Novices obtained images sufficient to estimate LVEF in 96% of pa-tients in < 5 minutes. Novices obtained PLAX views significantly faster than A4C (1.5 min vs. 2.3 min). Inter-rater reliability of LVEF estimation was very high (ICC 0.88-0.94) whether images were obtained by novices or experts. In n=65 patients, POCUS-AI LVEF was highly specific for a decreased LVEF< 40% (SP=90% for PLAX) but only moderately sensitive (SN=56-70%). Conclusion: Estimating cardiac LVEF from AI-enhanced POCUS is highly feasible even for novices in ICU settings, particu-larly using the PLAX view. POCUS-AI LVEF results were highly consistent whether performed by novice or expert. When AI detected a decreased LVEF, it was highly accurate, although a normal LVEF reported by POCUS-AI was not necessarily reas-suring. This POCUS-AI tool could be clinically useful to rapidly confirm a suspected low LVEF in an ICU patient. Further improvements to sensitivity for low LVEF are needed.

Article activity feed