Factors Influencing Community Pharmacists’ Participation in Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Inquiry

Very few studies, all employing surveys, have investigated the perceptions of community pharmacists regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). A qualitative inquiry exploring factors affecting community pharmacists’ participation in AMS may assist in the implementation of AMS in the primary care setting. This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and enablers of community pharmacists’ participation in AMS. One-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of community pharmacists from across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Analysis. Method. Twenty community pharmacists (70% female), representing urban, regional, and remote areas of Australia participated in the study. Pharmacists identified a discord between clinical needs of patients and practice policies as the primary source of excessive prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics. The fragmented nature of the primary health care system in Australia was seen as limiting information exchange between community pharmacists and general practitioners about antibiotic use, that was encouraging inappropriate and, at times, unsupervised use of antibiotics. The existing community pharmacy funding model in Australia, where individual pharmacists do not benefit from any financial incentives associated with clinical interventions, was also discouraging their participation in AMS. Pharmacists suggested restricting default antibiotic repeat supplies, reducing legal validity of antibiotic prescriptions to less than the current 12 months, and adopting a treatment duration-based approach to antibiotic prescribing instead of the ‘quantity-based’ approach, where the quantity prescribed is linked to the available pack size of the antibiotic. Structural changes in the way antibiotics are prescribed, dispensed, and funded in the Australian primary care setting are urgently needed to discourage their misuse by the public. Modifications to the current funding model for pharmacist-led cognitive services are needed to motivate pharmacists to participate in AMS initiatives.