Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines, Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
In dementia care, access to effective psychosocial interventions is often addressed by evidence-based guidelines for care providers. However, it is unclear if current guidelines consider personal characteristics that may impact intervention effectiveness. This study investigates if, and within what framing, dementia care guidelines in Europe address what is effective and for whom. A review of 47 guidelines from 12 European countries was conducted. Content analysis focused on: i) if guidelines recommended specific psychosocial interventions, and how guidelines referred to ii) social health, iii) intersection of social positioning, and iv) inequities in care or outcomes. Thirty-five guidelines (74%) recommended specific psychosocial interventions. Around half referenced aspects of social health and of intersectionality. Thirteen guidelines (28%) referenced inequities. Social health was not explicitly recognised as a mechanism of psychosocial interventions. Only age and comorbidity were consistently considered to impact interventions’ effectiveness. Inequities were acknowledged to arise from within-country regional variations and individual economic status but not linked to (intersectional) individual societal positions such as sex and/or gender, sexuality, and/or religion. Results between European countries were heterogeneous. Current guidelines offer little insight into what works for whom. Policymakers and guideline developers should work with researchers, generating and translating evidence into policy.