Emergency General Surgery in COVID-19 Patients, a Meta-Analysis

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems, including the management of emergency general surgery. Even though the pandemic ended, the new variants are continuously emerging, making it necessary to standardized the management protocols of emergency general surgery in COVID patients. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of emergency general surgery in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients, focusing on mortality, postoperative complications, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admissions. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted, including studies published between December 2019 and the present. Observational studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of emergency general surgery in adult patients with and without COVID-19 were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was employed, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot. Results: The analysis included 10 studies encompassing 7559 patients (3118 COVID19 group, 4441 non-COVID19 group). COVID-19 group patients demonstrated significantly higher mortality having odds ratio (OR) of 3.0036 (95% CI: 2.4263, 3.7184) and risk ratio (RR) of 2.8333 (95% Cl: 2.3127, 3.4712). Conclusion: Emergency general surgery in COVID-19 patients is associated with worse outcomes, including increased mortality, higher complication rates, and increased ICU admissions. These findings highlight the need for tailored perioperative strategies for COVID patients to mitigate risks.