Founding Physics on a Mathematical Background Reality
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PREreview)
Abstract
Physics makes two questionable assumptions: (1) Distant galaxies are accelerating relative to Earth. (2) Entangled objects are spatially separated from each other. Why questionable? Acceleration relative to Earth has never been observed in a single galaxy. Observers perceive entangled objects as spatially separated, yet 3D space is relative. We show that physical realities are projections of a mathematical background reality: 4D Euclidean space (ES). In Euclidean relativity (ER), all objects move through ES at the speed C. There is no time coordinate in ES. All action is due to a monotonically increasing, absolute, external evolution parameter θ. An observer experiences two projections of ES as space and time. The axis of his current 4D motion is his proper time τ. Three orthogonal axes form his 3D space x1, x2, x3. His physical reality is his spacetime x1(ϑ), x2(ϑ), x3(ϑ), τ(ϑ), where τ is a natural time coordinate and θ converts to absolute parameter time ϑ. Without gravity, his spacetime is Minkowski-like. As in general relativity (GR), gravity in ER is the curvature of spacetime. Since coordinates in GR are merely labels, the Einstein field equations also hold in systems that use τ as the time coordinate. ER predicts time’s arrow, relativistic effects, galactic motion, the Hubble tension, and entanglement. Remarkably, ER manages without cosmic inflation, expanding space, dark energy, and non-locality. ER tells us: (1) Distant galaxies maintain their recession speeds. (2) From their perspective, entangled objects have never been spatially separated, yet their proper time flows in opposite 4D directions.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17584624.
The author has remained in the old paradigm that physical time exists. He discusses proper time and coordinate time as that they are physical realities. They are not; they only exist as models. Time has no physical existence. In the universe, there is no proper time; there is no coordinate time. Time enters existence when measured. Clocks and time are human inventions. Universal space is time-invariant. It is not time that is relative. Relative is the velocity of change that runs in time-invariant space. Might be my recent article here might shed more light on the subject https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/0/51593
Competing interests
The author declares that …
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17584624.
The author has remained in the old paradigm that physical time exists. He discusses proper time and coordinate time as that they are physical realities. They are not; they only exist as models. Time has no physical existence. In the universe, there is no proper time; there is no coordinate time. Time enters existence when measured. Clocks and time are human inventions. Universal space is time-invariant. It is not time that is relative. Relative is the velocity of change that runs in time-invariant space. Might be my recent article here might shed more light on the subject https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/0/51593
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-