A Note on Fermat's Last Theorem
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Around 1637, Pierre de Fermat famously wrote in the margin of a book that he had a proof for the equation an + bn = cn having no positive integer solutions for exponents n > 2. While Andrew Wiles provided a complete proof in 1994 using advanced 20th-century machinery, the question of whether a simpler proof exists remains a subject of intense mathematical interest. In this work, we focus on a significant restricted case of the theorem: the situation in which the exponent n possesses a prime divisor p that does not divide the quantity abc. Under this natural arithmetic condition, we develop an elementary argument—based on Barlow’s Relations and p-adic valuations—that leads to a contradiction. These methods lie closer to the classical number-theoretic framework that Fermat himself might have envisioned, and they illuminate structural features of the Fermat equation that persist across related Diophantine problems.