Exploratory analysis of predictive factors for radiographic repair of endo-periodontal lesions: a pilot study

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the radiographic repair of EPLs, with a particular focus on clinical, periodontal, and systemic variables, using a decision tree analysis to identify the most influential factors. Material and method: This retrospective study analyzed records of patients treated for EPLs at UNIFAE (2022-2023), who received combined endodontic-periodontal therapy and were reassessed at least six months post-treatment. Clinical, demographic, and radiographic data were collected, including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), diabetes status, age, and follow-up duration. Patients were classified into two categories based on radiographic and clinical criteria: complete repair or partial repair. Statistical analyses included chi-square and t-tests, complemented by a decision tree model (CART algorithm) to identify the primary predictors of radiographic repair. Result: The study initially included 16 patients (18 teeth), but follow-up was completed with only seven patients (seven teeth), with longer follow-up linked to complete radiographic repair. The decision tree analysis confirmed follow-up time as the strongest predictor, followed by diabetes and PD. Patients with diabetes exhibited a higher likelihood of partial repair. Although bivariate analyses did not demonstrate statistical differences, the exploratory model highlighted the potential hierarchy of these variables. Conclusion: These findings suggest the importance of prolonged follow-up and systemic health, especially diabetes, in the prognosis of EPL treatment, emphasizing the need for individualized monitoring and integrated endodontic-periodontal care. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to confirm these predictors.

Article activity feed