Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: Data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

To determine the immunogenicity, efficacy, reactogenicity, and safety of a single dose of recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine (Ad5-nCoV, 5 × 10 10 viral particles per 0.5 mL dose), we conducted a single-dose, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group (3:1 Ad5-nCoV:placebo), phase 3 trial (Prometheus).

Methods

From 11-September-2020 to 05-May-2021, across six sites in the Russian Federation, 496 participants were injected with either placebo or Ad5-nCoV expressing the full-length spike (S) protein from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Results

Seroconversion (the primary endpoint) rates of 78.5% (95% CI: 73.9; 82.6) against receptor binding domain (RBD), 90.6% (95% CI: 87.2; 93.4) against S protein and 59.0% (95% CI: 53.3; 64.6) seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days post-vaccination were observed. Geometric mean titres (GMTs) were also elevated for antibodies against the RBD (405 [95% CI: 366; 449]) and S protein (677 [95% CI: 608; 753]) compared to the GMT of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (16.7 [95% CI: 15.3; 18.3]). Using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay after stimulating the cells with recombinant S protein ectodomain we showed that the Ad5-nCoV vaccine induced the most robust cellular immune response on Days 14 and 28. Up to Day 28, the primary and all secondary endpoints of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine were statistically significant compared with the placebo (р<0.001). Systemic reactions were reported in 113 of 496 (22.8%) participants (Ad5-nCoV, 26.9%; Placebo, 10.5%), and local reactions were reported in 108 (21.8%) participants (Ad5-nCoV, 28.5%; Placebo, 1.6%). These were generally mild and resolved within 7 days after vaccination. Of the six serious adverse events reported, none of the events were vaccine related. There were no deaths or premature withdrawals.

Conclusion

A single-dose of Ad5-nCoV vaccine induced a marked specific humoral and cellular immune response with a favourable safety profile.

Trial registration

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04540419 .

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.01.22271507: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The trial protocol was reviewed and approved by the Independent Ethics Committees of the involved sites and the Ethics Council of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
    Consent: To be included, participants needed to be able to understand the content of the informed consent documents and be willing to sign the informed consent form.
    Sex as a biological variableMen and women aged 18–85 years with a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2 were selected to participate if they had no indication of a current or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (e.g., respiratory infection in last 14 days, axillary temperature ≥37.0 °C) or close contact with a suspected or confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    RandomizationStudy Design and Participants: Prometheus is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial being conducted in six centres in the Russian Federation.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisInitially, as part of the interim analysis and to ensure 90% power for the between-group comparison of the primary variable, 180 subjects were to be included.
    Cell Line AuthenticationAuthentication: Eligible participants were randomly allocated to the Ad5-nCoV group or the Placebo group, in a 3:1 ratio, by an independent statistician using a validated system including a pseudorandom number generator with a seed value; allocation used block randomisation and stratification by study site.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Screening included the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) via a swab, and SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing to ensure negative results, as well as testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses via blood serum.
    SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M (IgM
    suggested: None
    immunoglobulin G (IgG
    suggested: None
    Determination of serum antibodies against the S protein and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and the presence of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were conducted on Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and after Month 6; neutralising antibodies against Ad5 were assessed on Day 0, Day 28 and after Month 6.
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Ad5
    suggested: None
    Horseradish-peroxidase conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-human IgG antibody was used to detect antibodies, visualised with tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution.
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    Anti-coronavirus neutralising antibodies were determined with a microneutralisation assay in which Vero cell (#ССL-81, American Type Culture Collection) monolayers were incubated in 96-well plates with 2-fold serial dilutions (1:10 to 1:1280) of participant serum.
    Anti-coronavirus neutralising antibodies
    suggested: None
    Anti-coronavirus neutralising
    suggested: None
    Anti-adenovirus neutralising antibodies were also determined using microneutralisation assay; A549 cell monolayers were incubated in 96-well plates with serial dilutions (1:10 to 1:1280) of participant serum and working dilutions of Ad5 (Adenovir; Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza).
    Anti-adenovirus neutralising
    suggested: None
    Plates were washed twice with PBS, washed twice with PBS + 0.05% Tween-20, and then incubated at room temperature with biotinylated anti-human IFN-γ detection antibody for 2 h.
    anti-human IFN-γ
    suggested: None
    The primary and secondary endpoints used the quantitative definition: the proportion of participants with at least a 4-fold increase in antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 S protein and/or its RBD, specifically.
    SARS-CoV-2 S protein
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Anti-coronavirus neutralising antibodies were determined with a microneutralisation assay in which Vero cell (#ССL-81, American Type Culture Collection) monolayers were incubated in 96-well plates with 2-fold serial dilutions (1:10 to 1:1280) of participant serum.
    Vero
    suggested: None
    Anti-adenovirus neutralising antibodies were also determined using microneutralisation assay; A549 cell monolayers were incubated in 96-well plates with serial dilutions (1:10 to 1:1280) of participant serum and working dilutions of Ad5 (Adenovir; Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza).
    A549
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Sequence encoding ΔFurin variant of SARS-CoV-2 S protein (amino acids 1–1213) containing a C-terminal Gly-Gly-6xHis tag was subcloned into the pMCAG-2T vector using the GeneArt Type IIs Assembly Kit, BbsI (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    pMCAG-2T
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Methods: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp.).
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This study has several limitations. First, the participants included in this study were all white, although conversely, this also provided the first data in a non-Chinese, European population. Second, this trial did not include children or pregnant women, and there were only a small number of older adults (35 were ≥60 years in the Ad5-nCoV group). An ideal candidate vaccine for COVID-19 should cover vulnerable populations of all ages. Anti-S protein-specific antibodies have been reported to decline rapidly in individuals who have recovered from COVID-19, especially those who were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms [23]. Third, the sample size was relatively small and some of the calculated 95% CIs were wide. Finally, virus mutation, an emerging problem, may reduce the effectiveness of current vaccines [24]. It is not known whether participants of this study were exposed to any COVID-19 variants. Further study is underway to determine neutralising antibodies to the widely circulating variants following vaccination with Ad5-nCoV, which include but are not limited to the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351) and Gamma (P.1 ) variants. Conclusions: Analysis of data from this phase 3 trial demonstrated the immunogenicity and safety of this Ad5-vector based COVID-19 vaccine. More data are required to determine whether this vaccine reduces infections and transmission. Overall, this stable, single-dose vaccine could contribute to the global fight against the evolving SARS-CoV-2 virus.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04540419Active, not recruitingClinical Trial of Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Ade…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.