Hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health workers: A randomized clinical trial

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Health care workers are at high risk of being infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in health personnel exposed to patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

Double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled single center clinical trial. Included subjects were health care workers caring for severe COVID-19 patients. Main outcome was time to symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

127 subjects with a confirmed baseline negative RT-PCR SARS-CoV2 test were included in the trial. 62 assigned to HCQ and 65 to placebo. One subject (1.6%) in the HCQ group and 6 (9.2%) subjects in the placebo group developed COVID-19 (Log-Rank test p = 0.07). No severe COVID-19 cases were observed. The study was suspended because of a refusal to participate and losses to follow up after several trials reported lack of effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Conclusion

The effect size of hydroxychloroquine was higher than placebo for COVID-19 symptomatic infection in health personnel, although this was not statistically significant. The trial is underpowered due to the failure to complete the estimated sample size.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.14.21257059: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before study entry.
    Sex as a biological variableAll women in reproductive age not using a permanent contraceptive method were asked to perform a urine pregnancy test (CERTUM diagnostics, Kabla diagnosticos, Mexico).
    RandomizationTrial design: This was a double-blind, randomized, head to head placebo-controlled clinical trial, held at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (INER) of Mexico, a public national referral center for respiratory diseases and a main teaching center and research facility for respiratory diseases.
    BlindingRecruiters, trial team and the evaluators of follow up condition were blinded to group assignment.
    Power AnalysisSample size: Th sample size calculation was estimated according the primary objective of the study, the time to a symptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection, assuming a 20% rate of infection in control group, as reported from Italy in February3, vs a 10% in the experimental group (10% reduction).

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Assay results were interpreted as follows: cutoff index, <1.0 for samples that were nonreactive/negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; cutoff index, ≥1.0 for samples that were reactive/positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
    anti-SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04318015RecruitingHydroxychloroquine Chemoprophylaxis in Healthcare Personnel …


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.