When months matter; modelling the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnostic pathway of Motor Neurone Disease (MND)

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

A diagnosis of MND takes an average 10–16 months from symptom onset. Early diagnosis is important to access supportive measures to maximise quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant delays in NHS pathways; the majority of GP appointments now occur online with subsequent delays in secondary care assessment. Given the rapid progression of MND, patients may be disproportionately affected resulting in late stage new presentations. We used Monte Carlo simulation to model the pre-COVID-19 diagnostic pathway and then introduced plausible COVID-19 delays.

Methods

The diagnostic pathway was modelled using gamma distributions of time taken: 1) from symptom onset to GP presentation, 2) for specialist referral, and 3) for diagnosis reached after neurology appointment. We incorporated branches to simulate delays: when patients did not attend their GP and when the GP consultation did not result in referral. An emergency presentation was triggered when diagnostic pathway time was within 30 days of projected median survival. Total time-to-diagnosis was calculated over 100,000 iterations. The pre-COVID-19 model was estimated using published data and the Improving MND Care Survey 2019. We estimated COVID-19 delays using published statistics.

Results

The pre-COVID model reproduced known features of the MND diagnostic pathway, with a median time to diagnosis of 399 days and predicting 5.2% of MND patients present as undiagnosed emergencies. COVID-19 resulted in diagnostic delays from 558 days when only primary care was 25% delayed, to 915 days when both primary and secondary care were 75%. The model predicted an increase in emergency presentations ranging from 15.4%-44.5%.

Interpretations

The model suggests the COVID-19 pandemic will result in later-stage diagnoses and more emergency presentations of undiagnosed MND. Late-stage presentations may require rapid escalation to multidisciplinary care. Proactive recognition of acute and late-stage disease with altered service provision will optimise care for people with MND.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.22.20248666: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    This involved: We included two branches to account for deviations from this serial process, both of which attempted to model real world data that accounted for diagnostic delays: Modelling the diagnostic pathway: Modelling was performed in Python 3 (pandas version 0.25.1, NumPy version 1.17.2, Seaborn version 0.12, SciPy version 1.3.1).
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    NumPy
    suggested: (NumPy, RRID:SCR_008633)
    SciPy
    suggested: (SciPy, RRID:SCR_008058)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    There are limitations to our approach, we have not modelled each MND phenotype individually. We have also taken a blanket approach, not necessarily accounting for local heterogeneity in service access which may arise due to factors including ease of access to a GP, the fluctuating geographical burden of COVID-19 and related restrictions. Ease of access to a GP can be affected by the size of the GP surgery, previous history with them and personal relationship with the GP. We have not considered inequality across the healthcare system such as people from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) populations that typically have less access to healthcare services 29. GP personal experience in recognising MND is also variable. Telephone consultation may amplify preconceptions in those with frailty or multimorbidity. Local services may have varying ability to secure appropriate palliative care and community AHP services; especially whilst responding to the additional posed by COVID-19. Nevertheless, we hope our predictions can inform healthcare providers leading to interventions which will increase diagnostic capacity. By taking a proactive approach to recognition of acute and later-stage disease and altering healthcare service provision, we can optimise care and quality of life for people affected by MND, during the pandemic and in the future.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.