Antibody profiling and prevalence in US patients during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Antibody diagnostics play an important role in disease detection and can potentially aid in monitoring of the immune responses to see if an individual has developed immunity. Developing high throughput diagnostics which does not involve handling of infectious material becomes imperative in the case of pandemics such as the recent outbreak of SARS-CoV2.
Methods
A protein microarray technology was used to detect the plurality of antibody response to four novel antigens namely S1 glycoprotein, Receptor binding domain (RBD), S2 glycoprotein and Nucleoprotein of the novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV2 using serum samples. A DBS card was additionally used to compare its performance with a venipuncture-based serum separator tube (SST) draw.
Results
The three main subclasses of antibodies IgM, IgA and IgG were analyzed to see the variations in immune responses in the affected population and compared to their microbial RT-PCR based NP swab results. The clinical sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 99.67% and 99.77%. In the matrix comparison study, which would enable patients to test without risk of transmitting the virus, DBS (Dried Blood Spot) matched with higher than 98% accuracy to a venipuncture-based SST collection.
Conclusion
Multiplex testing enables higher sensitivity and specificity which is essential while establishing exposure on a population scale. This flexible platform along with a discrete collection methodology would be crucial and broadly useful to scale up testing in current and future pandemics. Minimum sample volume that can be collected using DBS cards can be processed in this multiplex pillar plate format enabling the capacity to provide the reliability of high throughput analyzers while having the ease of collection similar to rapid tests.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.29.20085068: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Study Approval and Informed Consent Process: The study was conducted under the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The plate was incubated with the secondary antibody (1:2000 dilution of Goat Anti-Human IgG HRP and Goat Anti-Human IgM HRP and Goat Anti-Human IgA HRP individually) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Anti-Human IgGsuggested: NoneAnti-Human IgMsuggested: NoneAnti-Human IgAsuggested: None… SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.29.20085068: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Study Approval and Informed Consent Process: The study was conducted under the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The plate was incubated with the secondary antibody (1:2000 dilution of Goat Anti-Human IgG HRP and Goat Anti-Human IgM HRP and Goat Anti-Human IgA HRP individually) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Anti-Human IgGsuggested: NoneAnti-Human IgMsuggested: NoneAnti-Human IgAsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources The recombinant antigens were expressed in HEK293 cell lines using full length cDNA coding for the respective antigens fused with a hexa histidine purification tag. HEK293suggested: CLS Cat# 300192/p777_HEK293, RRID:CVCL_0045)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:When it comes to serological tests the main limitations that make them suboptimal tools for diagnosing those who are sick is that it takes time for the development of antibodies after infection. Thus, they may produce a false negative result in individuals who are acutely infected. On the other hand, they can be useful to indicate exposure in individuals who are asymptomatic or were symptomatic but PCR negative or were never tested. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the serological testing should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis of an acute COVID19 infection. Technology developments truly enable testing for multiple antibodies from small volumes of collected blood. The potential convenience and cost savings that it would bring to laboratory testing cannot be understated. Remote sampling such as with DBS cards, along with telemedicine would help providers to order tests not only in pandemic settings but also can be a great enabler in bringing healthcare costs down. Immediate application of such a platform to do multiplex testing would be in the monitoring of exposure to upper respiratory tract infections. A subset of the NP swab positive individuals are being monitored for antibody levels and symptoms at regular intervals from the time they tested positive. Initial results show that the seroconversion from IgM to IgG which is marked by a reduction in IgM titer might be co-related with recovery since it is accompanied by a negative result in the subsequent N...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-