Reliability and validity of the Japanese adaptation of human activity profile for evaluating physical activity in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Physical inactivity is a significant risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Assessment of physical activity is crucial for clinical management and therapeutic decisions in this population. The Human Activity Profile (HAP) questionnaire is widely used to evaluate functional ability across various populations, including those with chronic diseases. Although the HAP is reliable and convenient for use in clinical settings, no validated Japanese adaptation is available. In this study, we aimed to create a Japanese version of the HAP and evaluate its reliability and validity in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, the Japanese version of the HAP was translated with the permission of the original author. Physical activity was assessed using both the HAP questionnaire and an accelerometer. The total steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) time were calculated using an accelerometer. Validity was assessed by evaluating the correlation between the HAP maximum activity score and adjusted activity score (AAS) and objectively measured physical activity levels. Reliability was determined by readministering the HAP questionnaire. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 2,1 were used to evaluate the validity and reliability, respectively.
Results
We included 32 Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis (mean age 71.7 ± 9.2 years; 19 men). The Japanese version of the HAP AAS correlated with accelerometry-derived data, including both the number of steps and MVPA. The AAS was moderately correlated with MVPA ( ρ = 0.64, P < 0.001) and number of steps ( ρ = 0.55, P = 0.003). The Japanese version of HAP indicated a high degree of reliability (ICC = 0.84). The cutoff points for HAP were set to identify participants engaging in < 4000 steps per nondialysis day, the minimum recommended physical activity level for patients undergoing hemodialysis, and objectively measure physical activity. The AAS cutoff value was determined to be 50, with an area under the curve of 0.81, a high predictive capability.
Conclusions
We demonstrated the robust reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the HAP questionnaire in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Given the strong reliability and validity of the Japanese HAP questionnaire, incorporating this assessment into standard care may be valuable for evaluating the physical activity of patients undergoing hemodialysis.
