Head-to-head comparison of [177Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 and [161Tb]Tb-FAP-2286 efficacy in a PDAC mouse model
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Terbium-161 (Tb-161) emits internal conversion and Auger electrons, in addition to beta-minus radiation, which might be of added benefit for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) compared to Lutetium-177 (Lu-177). We extensively compared Lu-177 and Tb-161 for fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted TRT in a preclinical setting. To study this, FAP-2286 was labeled with Lu-177 and Tb-161 and characterized in vitro on FAP-expressing cells and ex vivo using patient tumor samples. Moreover, in vivo studies (i.e. biodistribution and efficacy) were performed using a clinically representative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Biodistribution was performed 1, 4, 24, and 48 h post injection of 5 MBq/500 pmol [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 or [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286. Subsequently, animals were treated with 4 × 40 MBq/500 pmol [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 or [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286 and with alternating doses of 2 × 40 MBq/500 pmol of each radiopharmaceutical.
Results
No difference in [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 and [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286 uptake was observed in the cell models. In vivo studies did not show a survival benefit after 4 × 40 MBq/500 pmol [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 or [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286, while Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated a modest prolonged survival after tandem therapy in mice that first received [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 followed by [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286. Dosimetry calculations based on autoradiography studies on patient tumor samples showed that even with lower binding, a higher absorbed dose to the tumor can be accomplished with [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286.
Conclusions
In our in vitro and in vivo studies, [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 and [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286 demonstrated similar behavior. In the applied PDAC mouse model, FAP-TRT showed limited therapeutic efficacy, most likely due to the limited radiopharmaceutical uptake observed in the tumors. This hampered determination of a potential benefit of either radioisotope for FAP-TRT. Of note, a modest response was observed in the tandem therapy group that first received [ 177 Lu]Lu-FAP-2286, followed by [ 161 Tb]Tb-FAP-2286.
