Distinct temporal characteristics of circulating alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury markers in ARDS with COVID-19
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.10.21249528: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Yokohama City University Hospital (B200700100).
Consent: Informed consent was waived in view of the retrospective observational nature of the study.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:There …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.10.21249528: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Yokohama City University Hospital (B200700100).
Consent: Informed consent was waived in view of the retrospective observational nature of the study.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:There are some limitations to our study. First, the sample size was small because of the factor of availability of daily serum samples from patients with COVID-19 ARDS. This may have affected the statistical strength of our analyses. It is, hence, necessary to confirm our results using samples from large cohorts to obtain insights into the pathogenesis of alveolar tissue injury during COVID-19. Second, because of the observational nature of the study design, treatments for COVID-19 were not standardized. Therefore, it is possible that the treatment strategies might affect the kinetics of circulating alveolar tissue injury markers. In conclusion, our evaluation of circulating alveolar tissue injury markers indicates that the alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury have distinct time courses and pathogenic contributions in ARDS with COVID-19. The injury to endothelial cells, which continues for a longer period than the epithelial injury, seems to be the main contributor to alveolar barrier disruption. Targeting the endothelial injury rather than the epithelial injury, may be a potential efficacious approach to overcome ARDS with COVID-19.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-