Evaluation of Telehealth in Child Behavioral Health Services Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.10.21264817: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: 23 The study was conducted with the approval of the University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    The results of this study should be contextualized within its limitations. There were no precise service data available that described the exact proportion of services delivered via telehealth vs. those delivered in-person during the pandemic. Data from the Idaho Office of the Governor indicates a 40-fold increase in telehealth sessions from March through May 2020.20 However, more data are needed in order to better contextualize the findings and to directly investigate the relationship between caregiver transportation needs, telehealth service delivery, and child-level outcomes. Substantially fewer children were served in Idaho in 2020 compared to 2019. Matched pre- and during-pandemic samples were largely comparable based on demographic and clinical variables, but the unmatched number of children served and number of CANS assessments done in April-December 2020 was nearly half those during the same time period in 2019. While this reduction in care delivery is consistent with some documented trends of reduced healthcare delivery in the US during the pandemic,31 we cannot rule out that some other sample-specific factors mitigated the impact of transportation. Given the remaining large sample size, we can rule out statistical power as a potential threat to the validity of this study. The intensity and quality of care differences are unknown. It is possible that children served during pandemic received fewer, shorter-length or less organized services. However, results indicated ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.