Residual SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens detected in GI and hepatic tissues from five recovered patients with COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.28.20219014: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (reference number: 2019/2653).
    Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from both patients 1 and 2.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableStudy cohort: Patient 1 was a middle-aged male who was diagnosed with COVID-19 in April 2020.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Multiplex immunohistochemistr: Multiplex immunohistochemistry was performed using an Opal Multiplex fIHC kit (Akoya Bioscience, USA), as we previously described.(7-9) In brief, FFPE tissue samples (4 µm-thick) were labelled with primary antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (Polyclonal), ACE2 (EPR4435(2)), CD14 (EPR3653) and CD68 (PG-M1) (Table 1), followed by appropriate secondary antibodies and Opal fluorophore-conjugated tyramide signal amplification (Akoya Bioscience, USA).
    ACE2
    suggested: None
    CD14
    suggested: (LSBio (LifeSpan Cat# LS-C105589, RRID:AB_2275679)
    CD68
    suggested: None
    PG-M1 ) ( Table 1
    suggested: None
    Next, cells were surface stained with antibody cocktail containing Pacific Orange-anti CD45 (HI30), BV605-anti CD103 (Ber-ACT8), BV750-anti CD4 (SK3), Alexa 532-anti CD3 (UCHT1), PerCP-eFluor 710-anti CD38 (HB7) and PE-CF594-anti CD39 (TU66) (Table 1) in Brilliant Stain Buffer (BD Biosciences, USA), followed by incubation for 30 min at 4°C in the dark.
    CD45
    suggested: (RayBiotech Cat# CS-11-0123, RRID:AB_1228026)
    HI30
    suggested: None
    BV605-anti CD103
    suggested: None
    Ber-ACT8
    suggested: None
    BV750-anti CD4
    suggested: None
    CD3
    suggested: None
    UCHT1
    suggested: None
    CD38
    suggested: None
    PE-CF594-anti
    suggested: None
    CD39
    suggested: None
    TU66
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Data analysis was performed using FlowJo V.10 software (FlowJo LLC, USA).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.