Women in healthcare experiencing occupational stress and burnout during COVID-19: a rapid review
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
COVID-19 has had an unprecedent impact on physicians, nurses and other health professionals around the world, and a serious healthcare burnout crisis is emerging as a result of this pandemic.
Objectives
We aim to identify the causes of occupational stress and burnout in women in medicine, nursing and other health professions during the COVID-19 pandemic and interventions that can support female health professionals deal with this crisis through a rapid review.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and ERIC from December 2019 to 30 September 2020. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO and is available online. We selected all empirical studies that discussed stress and burnout in women healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results
The literature search identified 6148 citations. A review of abstracts led to the retrieval of 721 full-text articles for assessment, of which 47 articles were included for review. Our findings show that concerns of safety (65%), staff and resource adequacy (43%), workload and compensation (37%) and job roles and security (41%) appeared as common triggers of stress in the literature.
Conclusions and relevance
The current literature primarily focuses on self-focused initiatives such as wellness activities, coping strategies, reliance of family, friends and work colleagues to organisational-led initiatives such as access to psychological support and training. Very limited evidence exists about the organisational interventions such as work modification, financial security and systems improvement.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.08.21249468: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethical Considerations: This study used secondary data analysis using published research; therefore, it did not require submission to the Research Ethics Committee. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Overall Objectives: The overall objectives of this review are to (a) explore the triggers of occupational stress, and burnout faced by women in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic and (b) identify interventions that can support their well-being through a systematic review. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Search Methods and Information Sources: We conducted … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.08.21249468: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethical Considerations: This study used secondary data analysis using published research; therefore, it did not require submission to the Research Ethics Committee. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Overall Objectives: The overall objectives of this review are to (a) explore the triggers of occupational stress, and burnout faced by women in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic and (b) identify interventions that can support their well-being through a systematic review. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Search Methods and Information Sources: We conducted comprehensive literature search strategies in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (via Ovid), and ERIC (via ProQuest). MEDLINEsuggested: (MEDLINE, RRID:SCR_002185)Embasesuggested: (EMBASE, RRID:SCR_001650)PsycINFOsuggested: (PsycINFO, RRID:SCR_014799)ProQuestsuggested: (ProQuest, RRID:SCR_006093)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-