COVID-19 Antibody Detection and Assay Performance Using Red Cell Agglutination

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

We recently developed a red cell based assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma. In the current study, we show the hands-on application of this assay in a group of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors and healthy individuals.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.09.21258232: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved protocols were NCT04360278, NCT00001846 and NCT00067054, respectively, which entailed written informed consent.
    Consent: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved protocols were NCT04360278, NCT00001846 and NCT00067054, respectively, which entailed written informed consent.
    Field Sample Permit: The plasma controls from 2008 were collected under the Vaccine Research Center’s (VRC), National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays: Two chemiluminescent immunoassays directed against the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, Ortho IgG (80.8% overall sensitivity and 98.1% overall specificity) [15], and Ortho Total (IgG, IgA and IgM; 87.7% overall sensitivity and 95.2% overall specificity) [15] (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA), authorized by FDA under an EUA for use by laboratories certified under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), were used to detect total binding antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in all 140 CCP donors [14, 15].
    SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein , Ortho IgG
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04360278RecruitingPlasma Collection From Convalescent and/or Immunized Donors …
    NCT00001846RecruitingCollection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy…
    NCT00067054RecruitingApheresis and Specimen Collection Procedures to Obtain Plasm…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.