Diverse Humoral Immune Responses in Younger and Older Adult COVID-19 Patients
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
As numerous viral variants continue to emerge in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, determining antibody reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 epitopes becomes essential in discerning changes in the immune response to infection over time. This study enabled us to identify specific areas of antigenicity within the SARS-CoV-2 proteome, allowing us to detect correlations of epitopes with clinical metadata and immunological signals to gain holistic insight into SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249702: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Collection of blood samples and deidentified patient information was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board IRB-HSR #22231 and 200110. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Microarrays were probed with sera and antibody binding detected by incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated goat anti-human IgG or IgA or IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA or Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA). anti-human IgGsuggested: NoneIgAsuggested: NoneIgG, IgA and IgM … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249702: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Collection of blood samples and deidentified patient information was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board IRB-HSR #22231 and 200110. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Microarrays were probed with sera and antibody binding detected by incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated goat anti-human IgG or IgA or IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA or Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA). anti-human IgGsuggested: NoneIgAsuggested: NoneIgG, IgA and IgM antibodies are captured by specific bead-region microspheres, each conjugated with SARS-CoV-2 antigen subunits S1, S2, RBD, or N, and are measured by median fluorescent intensity (MFI). IgMsuggested: Noneantigen subunits S1suggested: NoneFifty μL of phycoerythrin-anti-human immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA or IgM per kit in use) detection antibody was added to each well, plate sealed and incubated 90 minutes at room temperature with constant shaking. phycoerythrin-anti-human immunoglobulin ( IgGsuggested: NoneAntibody responses to individual reactive antigens (n=52) were modeled as dependent variables, and the following variables were modeled as independent variables: sex, age category, requirement of a ventilator, days symptomatic prior to sample collection, length of hospital stay, admission to the ICU, maximum required supplemental oxygen category, comorbidity score, maximum body temperature during while admitted, body-mass index (BMI), maximum CRP, maximum ferritin, maximum D dimer, minimum lymphocytes, maximum AST and troponin lab levels, and the base 2 log-transformed measurements from the Milliplex serum analysis. BMIsuggested: Nonetroponin lab levels ,suggested: NoneTo select variables associated with SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, linear mixed effects regression (LMER) was used to model all antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 reactive antigens with random intercepts at the sample level and antigen level to adjust for repeated measures. SARS-CoV-2-specificsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Protein microarray analysis of serum samples: The first generation multi-coronavirus protein microarray, produced by Antigen Discovery, Inc. (ADI, Irvine, CA, USA), included 935 full-length coronavirus proteins, overlapping 100, 50 and 30 aa protein fragments and overlapping 13-20 aa peptides from SARS-CoV-2 (WA-1), SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-OC43. HCoV-NL63suggested: RRID:CVCL_RW88)All these coronavirus proteins were produced in Escherichia coli except the SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV S proteins, which were made in Sf9 insect cells and the SARS-CoV-2 RBD, made in HEK-293 cells. HEK-293suggested: CLS Cat# 300192/p777_HEK293, RRID:CVCL_0045)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data visualization was performed using the circlize (20), ComplexHeatmap (21), ggplot2 and corrplot (22)packages in R. ComplexHeatmapsuggested: (ComplexHeatmap, RRID:SCR_017270)ggplot2suggested: (ggplot2, RRID:SCR_014601)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:A substantial limitation in our study was the small sample size which likely limited our ability to detect relationships between epitopes, cytokines, and clinical outcomes. This further limited in our ability to statistically analyze and classify our serosilent samples and therefore were categorized subjectively based on full length IVTT N and S2 protein reactivity. As this small cohort is meant for hypothesis generation, a larger cohort is needed to further validate our findings. Our study is also limited to epitopes produced in Escherichia coli which restricts our ability to see epitopes that require eukaryotic post-translational modification such as glycosylation. This is particularly relevant in regards to the spike protein, which exists as a trimer on the virion surface and undergoes conformational changes during viral entry into cells (6). As addressed in Camerini et al we also observed similar limitations in response to S1 fragments produced in vitro, which perhaps was influenced in part by prokaryotic production of IVTT proteins. However, we were able to detect an area in S1 which is notable in its correlations and outcomes as discussed above.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-