Microglia Do Not Restrict SARS-CoV-2 Replication following Infection of the Central Nervous System of K18-Human ACE2 Transgenic Mice

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Understanding the immunological mechanisms contributing to both host defense and disease following viral infection of the CNS is of critical importance given the increasing number of viruses that are capable of infecting and replicating within the nervous system. With this in mind, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the role of microglia in aiding in host defense following experimental infection of the central nervous system (CNS) of K18-hACE2 with SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.15.468761: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: Mice and viral infection: All experiments were performed in accordance with animal protocols approved by the University of California, Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Several primary antibodies were used, including Iba1 (1:500 Wako), GFAP (1:1000 Abcam), Mac2/ Galactin-3 (1:500, CL8942AP Cedarlane), CD4 (1:200 Abcam), CD8 (1:200 Abcam), MHC I (1:200 Abcam), and MHC II (1:200 Abcam).
    Iba1
    suggested: (US Biological Cat# S1000-78G1, RRID:AB_2270053)
    GFAP
    suggested: None
    CD4
    suggested: None
    CD8
    suggested: None
    On the second day, slides were treated with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:1000 goat anti-rat/rabbit Invitrogen, 1:1000 goat anti-chicken, Abcam) following PBS rinsing.
    anti-rat/rabbit
    suggested: None
    anti-chicken ,
    suggested: None
    Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in blocking solution with primary antibodies anti-MAP2 (EnCor Biotech. Cat:NC0388389) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (Sino Bio.
    anti-MAP2
    suggested: None
    anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (Sino Bio.
    suggested: None
    Cells were then washed with 1X PBS and incubated in blocking solution for 2hrs at RT with secondary antibodies, Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-chicken and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit.
    anti-chicken
    suggested: (AnaSpec; EGT Group Cat# 29709-1-H488, RRID:AB_10563238)
    anti-rabbit
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    8-16 week-old heterozygous K18-hACE2 C57BL/6 [strain: B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J] mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory.
    C57BL/6
    suggested: None
    B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J]
    suggested: RRID:IMSR_JAX:034860)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The relative fold change between samples used in the ddCt calculation was calculated (2-ddCt). qPCR statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed in Prism (GraphPad Software).
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Reads passing quality control were used for quantification using featureCounts and analyzed with the R package DESeq2 to identify DEGs
    featureCounts
    suggested: (featureCounts, RRID:SCR_012919)
    DESeq2
    suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)
    Genes passing an FDR of 10% were used for GO enrichment analysis using GOrilla (27) (http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il/).
    http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il/
    suggested: (GOrilla: Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis and Visualization Tool, RRID:SCR_006848)
    From those lists, the genes with the top 100 most variable TPM were plotted using the R package pheatmap.
    pheatmap
    suggested: (pheatmap, RRID:SCR_016418)
    Following fixation, the 24-48hr brains were either cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, embedded in O.C.T. (Fisher HealthCare), and sliced via Cryostat in 10µm sagittal sections.
    Fisher HealthCare
    suggested: None
    Cell quantities were determined using the spots module in Imaris.
    Imaris
    suggested: (Imaris, RRID:SCR_007370)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04343651CompletedStudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Leronlimab for …
    NCT04347239Active, not recruitingStudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Leronlimab for …
    NCT04878055RecruitingStudy on Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in the Treatment o…
    NCT04347226RecruitingAnti-Interleukin-8 (Anti-IL-8) for Patients With COVID-19
    NCT04389645CompletedInterferon Gamma Induced Protein 10 (IP-10) in a Clinical De…


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 36. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • No conflict of interest statement was detected. If there are no conflicts, we encourage authors to explicit state so.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.