Human Nasal and Lung Tissues Infected Ex Vivo with SARS-CoV-2 Provide Insights into Differential Tissue-Specific and Virus-Specific Innate Immune Responses in the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
In order to reduce the late-phase morbidity and mortality of COVID-19, there is a need to better understand and target the earliest stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the human respiratory tract. Here, we have studied the initial steps of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the consequent innate immune responses within the natural multicellular complexity of human nasal mucosal and lung tissues.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.08.434404: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The studies were approved by the Hadassah Medical Center and the Sheba Medical Center Institutional Review Boards. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The following primary antibodies were used: Ep-CAM (Mouse monoclonal, Ep-CAMsuggested: NoneThe following secondary antibodies were used: Donkey anti-Mouse IgG pre-adsorbed, Alexa Fluor® 568 (1:250 anti-Mouse IgGsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Cells and viruses: Simian kidney Vero E6 (ATCC CRL-1586) and Madin-Darby Canine … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.08.434404: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The studies were approved by the Hadassah Medical Center and the Sheba Medical Center Institutional Review Boards. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources The following primary antibodies were used: Ep-CAM (Mouse monoclonal, Ep-CAMsuggested: NoneThe following secondary antibodies were used: Donkey anti-Mouse IgG pre-adsorbed, Alexa Fluor® 568 (1:250 anti-Mouse IgGsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Cells and viruses: Simian kidney Vero E6 (ATCC CRL-1586) and Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK, ATCC® CCL-34™) cells were maintained in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM; Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 10 IU/ml Penicillin, and 10 μg/ml streptomycin (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel). E6suggested: NoneSARS-CoV-2 clinical isolate (SARS-CoV-2 isolate Israel-Jerusalem-854/2020) was isolated on Vero E6 cells from a positive nasopharyngeal swab sample, obtained at the Hadassah Hospital Clinical Virology Laboratory. Vero E6suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)The virus titers of cleared infected cells- and tissue supernatants were determined by a standard TCID50 assay on Vero E6 cells (SARS-CoV-2) or MDCK cells (influenza virus). MDCKsuggested: CLS Cat# 602280/p823_MDCK_(NBL-2, RRID:CVCL_0422)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Whole-mount tissues were visualized using a Nikon A1R confocal microscope and were analyzed using NIS Elements software (Nikon) NIS Elementssuggested: (NIS-Elements, RRID:SCR_014329)Normalization and differential expression were done with the DESeq2 package (version 1.22.2). DESeq2suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)Pathway and molecular function and disease enrichment analysis of the significantly differentially expressed genes was carried out using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA®) Ingenuity Pathway Analysissuggested: (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, RRID:SCR_008653)Dot plots of selected IPA® canonical pathways (based on IPA® values for BH P-values and number of genes) were generated using ggplot2 R graphical package (Wickham H (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. ggplot2suggested: (ggplot2, RRID:SCR_014601)ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.) Statistical analysis: All data, presented as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEM), were analyzed using unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test in GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software Inc. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)GraphPadsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Data availability: The transcriptomic data described in this publication have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE163959. Gene Expression Omnibussuggested: (Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, RRID:SCR_005012)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our study has several limitations. The cellular heterogeneity within the tissues limits the resolution of isolated molecular pathways. Additionally, native respiratory tissues in organ culture are relatively short-lived (∼a week) compared to primary human airway epithelial cells and to the self-renewable stem cell-derived organoid cultures, which have proven useful for the studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and cellular response (9–11, 43, 44). Nonetheless, our studies recapitulate viral infection and host response within the authentic multicellular and morphologically-intact tissue microenvironment - containing tissue epithelial, vascular endothelial, stromal and immune cells, and the specific extracellular matrix. It is notable that the comparative data between the human nasal and lung tissues were not obtained from the same individuals. Yet, we believe that the findings, based on extensive analyses of independent tissues from different individuals, faithfully support the generalizability of the observed tissue-specific patterns. Notwithstanding, the comparison of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza infections was done in parallel within the same donor tissue. Furthermore, these studies capture the inherent person-to-person variability of innate immune responses, thereby paving the way to future studies of personal host features which determine the innate responses to viral infection along the respiratory tract. In summary, we have demonstrated the active replication of SARS-CoV-2 in nat...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 45. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
