Saliva Is a Promising Alternative Specimen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adults

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Testing efforts for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for health care workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to that of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Study design conducted at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles was approved by the Institutional Review Board under IRB #CHLA-20-00124 and CHLA-18-00098.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Total nucleic acid was extracted from 250 µL samples using the Thermo Fisher KingFisher Flex specimen processing system with the Applied Biosystems MagMAX Viral/Pathogen Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and eluted to 50 µL of total nucleic acid.
    Thermo Fisher KingFisher
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations of this study include the small sample size of both children, particularly younger children, and adults from a single medical institution. Second, this study consisted of only outpatients, patients admitted to the emergency department, and family members who volunteered to enroll in the study which can bias our findings regarding the role of COVID-19 exposure to specimen performance. Since viral load may or may not be correlated with clinical manifestations, further studies should be conducted in inpatient or ICU settings as the spectrum of disease ranges from asymptomatic to severely ill patients (21-23). Finally, despite a standardized protocol utilized during the collection of the saliva samples, it can be challenging for children to properly salivate into a collection device. The volume of saliva obtained may also vary among patients due to excessive bubbles and other factors despite the same amount of saliva being processed for testing.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.