SARS-CoV-2 genome-wide T cell epitope mapping reveals immunodominance and substantial CD8 + T cell activation in COVID-19 patients
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
CD8 + T cell recognition is detected throughout the SARS-CoV-2 genome and is associated with COVID-19 disease severity.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.19.344911: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Clinical samples: Approval for the study design and sample collection was obtained from the Commitee on Health Research Ethics in the Capital Region of Denmark.
Consent: All included patients and health care employees gave their informed written consent for inclusion.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were then mixed with 20 μL antibody staining solution CD8-BV480 (BD B566121) (final dilution 1/50), dump channel antibodies (CD4-FITC (BD 345768) (final dilution 1/80), CD14-FITC (BD 345784) … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.19.344911: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Clinical samples: Approval for the study design and sample collection was obtained from the Commitee on Health Research Ethics in the Capital Region of Denmark.
Consent: All included patients and health care employees gave their informed written consent for inclusion.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were then mixed with 20 μL antibody staining solution CD8-BV480 (BD B566121) (final dilution 1/50), dump channel antibodies (CD4-FITC (BD 345768) (final dilution 1/80), CD14-FITC (BD 345784) (final dilution 1/32), CD19-FITC (BD 345776) (final dilution 1/16), CD40-FITC (Serotech MCA1590F) (final dilution 1/40), CD16-FITC (BD 335035) (final dilution 1/64)) and a dead cell marker (LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR; Invitrogen L10119) (final dilution 1/1000) and incubated for 30 min at 4°C. CD40-FITCsuggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700177, RRID:AB_10897459)Surface marker antibodies CD3-FITC (BD Biosciences 345764 (final dilution 1/20)), CD4-BUV395 (BD Biosciences 742738 (final dilution 1/300), CD8-BV480 (BD Biosciences B566121 (final dilution 1/50)), and dead cell marker (LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR; Invitrogen L10119) (final dilution 1/1000)) were used to identify CD8+ T cells producing intracellular cytokines (Gating strategy, Supplementary Figure 5). CD8-BV480suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources The similarity of SARS-CoV-2 ligands and epitopes from both patient and healthy donor cohorts to a set of human common cold corona viruses (HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43) was tested using two methods. HCoV-NL63suggested: RRID:CVCL_RW88)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources , Becton Dickinson) and gated by the FACSDiva acquisition program (Becton Dickinson), and all the PE-positive (SARS-CoV-2 multimer binding) and APC-positive (CEF multimer binding) cells of CD8+ gate were sorted into pre-saturated tubes (2% BSA, 100 μl barcode cytometry buffer) (Supplementary Figure 9A) FACSDivasuggested: (BD FACSDiva Software, RRID:SCR_001456)The analysis of barcode enrichment was based on methods designed for the analysis of RNA-seq data and was implemented in the R package edgeR. edgeRsuggested: (edgeR, RRID:SCR_012802)downsampled (FlowJo plugin), and visualized using UMAP (Version 2.2, FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)The data was plotted using python 3.7.4. pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)Box plots for data quantification and visualization were generated, and their related statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc.) (Figure 2C; Figure 3C, D, F; Figure 4A, B, D) or R studio (Supplementary Figure 8). GraphPadsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)For unpaired comparisons Mann-Whitney test was done using GraphPad Prism, all p values are indicated in figure legends. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
