Subtle differences in the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 in rhesus macaques

  1. Vincent J. Munster
  2. Meaghan Flagg
  3. Manmeet Singh
  4. Claude Kwe Yinda
  5. Brandi N. Williamson
  6. Friederike Feldmann
  7. Lizzette Pérez-Pérez
  8. Jonathan Schulz
  9. Beniah Brumbaugh
  10. Myndi G. Holbrook
  11. Danielle R. Adney
  12. Atsushi Okumura
  13. Patrick W. Hanley
  14. Brian J. Smith
  15. Jamie Lovaglio
  16. Sarah L. Anzick
  17. Craig Martens
  18. Neeltje van Doremalen
  19. Greg Saturday
  20. Emmie de Wit

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 do not cause more severe disease in rhesus macaques.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1126/sciadv.abj3627
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.07.443115: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: Ethics and biosafety statement: All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rocky Mountain Laboratories, NIH and carried out in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International accredited facility, according to the institution’s guidelines for animal use, following the guidelines and basic principles in the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the Animal Welfare Act, United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
    Sex as a biological variableAll but one of the older animals were male.
    RandomizationSamples from animals inoculated with different variants were randomized across plates to mitigate batch effects.
    BlindingThe animals were observed and scored daily according to a standardized scoring sheet (23); the same person, blinded to the isolate the animals received, assessed the animals throughout the study.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    The inocula were titered on Vero E6 cells to confirm the correct dose was administered.
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Remaining reads were mapped to the the respective hCOV_19/England/204820464/2020, hCoV-19/USA/MD-HP01542/2021, and SARS-CoV-2/human/USA/RML-7/2020 genomes using Bowtie2 version 2.2.9 with parameters --local --no-mixed -X 1500.
    Bowtie2
    suggested: (Bowtie 2, RRID:SCR_016368)
    PCR duplicates were removed using picard MarkDuplicates (Broad Institute) and variants were called using GATK HaplotypeCaller version 4.1.2.0 (27) with parameter-ploidy 2.
    GATK
    suggested: (GATK, RRID:SCR_001876)
    Data were analyzed using Python (version 3.8.5) and GraphPad Prism (version 8.2.1).
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Ward’s) was performed on Euclidean pairwise distance matrices calculated from the mean of the log2 fold change or concentration of analytes from animals in each group at each available timepoint using SciPy (version 1.6.0) and Seaborn (version 0.11.1) packages in Python.
    SciPy
    suggested: (SciPy, RRID:SCR_008058)
    Sequences have been deposited in NCBI under BioProject Accession number PRJNA727012.
    BioProject
    suggested: (NCBI BioProject, RRID:SCR_004801)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    One limitation of our study is the lack of comorbidities and severe disease manifestations in the rhesus macaque model. However, the age range of the animals used in this study (age range 2-16 years old) is probably a fair reflection of the population currently exhibiting the highest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, which appears to be younger than early during the COVID-19 pandemic (37). Despite the lower pathogenicity of B.1.351 overall, severe disease is still expected to occur in individuals with comorbidities. More targeted epidemiological studies are needed to clarify the impact of variants of concern on the disease burden in various subpopulations with and without comorbidities, while excluding the effect of confounding factors such as the overall number of cases and changes in human behavior. The B.1.351 lineage has been associated with reduced neutralization by convalescent sera of humans previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and in people vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (38). In addition, reduced vaccine efficacy against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 was observed with the B.1.351 variant for vaccines tested in multi-center clinical trials in South Africa and Qatar (39, 40). Rechallenge studies in hamsters suggest that prior exposure with SARS-CoV-2 protects against disease but not re-infection of the upper respiratory tract (41). These studies, together with our side-by-side comparison of three SARS-CoV-2 variants in the most relevant animal model for preclinical develo...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2021.05.07.443115v1 on bioRxiv