Lockdown fatigue among college students during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Predictive role of personal resilience, coping behaviors, and health

  1. Leodoro J. Labrague
  2. Cherry Ann Ballad

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1111/ppc.12765
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.18.20213942: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: To qualify for the study, students had to: a) be currently enrolled in a college or university, b) be a full-time student, c) be either male or female, and d) consent to participate in the study.
    IRB: Data Collection and Ethical Considerations: The Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Samar State University, Philippines (IRERC EI□0123□I) granted the ethical clearance for this study.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableTo qualify for the study, students had to: a) be currently enrolled in a college or university, b) be a full-time student, c) be either male or female, and d) consent to participate in the study.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Using the G*power program software, an estimation of required sample size was performed.
    G*power
    suggested: (G*Power, RRID:SCR_013726)
    Data Analysis: Data completeness was checked before entering data into SPSS version 25.
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations of the study: This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, due to the design of the study, it is impossible to establish causality between students’ variables and lockdown fatigue. Second, since most of the study variables are dynamic (e.g. fatigue, resilience, health) and may therefore change over time, it is important to use longitudinal research designs in future studies. Third, to improve the generalisability and representativeness of the study, future studies should include more samples from other areas of the country. Finally, the use of self-reported scales is a possible limitation of the study, as it may cause response bias.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2020.10.18.20213942v1 on medRxiv