SARS‐CoV‐2 infection induces soluble platelet activation markers and PAI‐1 in the early moderate stage of COVID‐19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Introduction

Coagulation dysfunction and thromboembolism emerge as strong comorbidity factors in severe COVID‐19. However, it is unclear when particularly platelet activation markers and coagulation factors dysregulated during the pathogenesis of COVID‐19. Here, we sought to assess the levels of coagulation and platelet activation markers at moderate and severe stages of COVID‐19 to understand the pathogenesis.

Methods

To understand this, hospitalized COVID‐19 patients with (severe cases that required intensive care) or without pneumonia (moderate cases) were recruited. Phenotypic and molecular characterizations were performed employing basic coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D‐Dimer, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). The flow cytometry‐based multiplex assays were performed to assess FXI, anti‐thrombin, prothrombin, fibrinogen, FXIII, P‐selectin, sCD40L, plasminogen, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1), and D‐Dimer.

Results

The investigations revealed induction of plasma P‐selectin and CD40 ligand (sCD40L) in moderate COVID‐19 cases, which were significantly abolished with the progression of COVID‐19 severity. Moreover, a profound reduction in plasma tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and FXIII were identified particularly in the severe COVID‐19. Further analysis revealed fibrinogen induction in both moderate and severe patients. Interestingly, an elevated PAI‐1 more prominently in moderate, and tPA particularly in severe COVID‐19 cases were observed. Particularly, the levels of fibrinogen and tPA directly correlated with the severity of the disease.

Conclusions

In summary, induction of soluble P‐selectin, sCD40L, fibrinogen, and PAI‐1 suggests the activation of platelets and coagulation system at the moderate stage before COVID‐19 patients require intensive care. These findings would help in designing better thromboprophylaxis to limit the COVID‐19 severity.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.23.457378: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT00713648CompletedEvaluation of Recombinant Factor XIII for Prevention of Blee…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.