The impact of COVID ‐19 lockdown on children's and adolescents' mental health in Greece

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on children's and adolescents' mental health in Greece during the lockdown of spring 2020. A cross‐sectional survey of 1232 Greek parents was conducted in spring 2020. 35.1% of parents reported that their children's psychological health was significantly affected. Parental unemployment, limited opportunity for tele‐work and deteriorating psychological health, increased family conflicts and children's pre‐existing physical health conditions were all significantly associated with mental health impact. Children and adolescents may experience adverse mental health effects due to the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.18.20214643: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: Initially, participants were presented with an informed consent, consisting of a brief presentation of the research group and the purpose of the study.
    IRB: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of West Attica in Athens, Greece.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All analyses were performed using SPSS v.
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations: An important limitation of our study is the fact that we used an online, convenience sample, which is not representative of the population studied. It has been argued that non-representative samples attract volunteers who are already well engaged, interested in the topic, who can access the internet, while those excluded, for instance individuals with severe mental illness, are often those most in need.41 Therefore, our findings cannot be interpreted as an overall prevalence of psychopathology among children in the general population. However, our results indicate that individuals with various types of vulnerabilities are at higher risk for negative outcomes of the current crisis. Given the argument that vulnerable populations may have been excluded from our surveys, it could be expected that the real impact of COVID-19 pandemic could be of greater magnitude for specific population sub-groups. Another limitation of our study is the fact that we used only parental reports. However, we collected our data during the lockdown and there were only limited opportunities to use more subjective measures of children’s characteristics and difficulties. Additionally, the online nature of the design of our study presented significant difficulties for the use of children as informants, especially for younger children that were the majority in our sample.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.