Immune response to COVID ‐19 vaccination is attenuated by poor disease control and antimyeloma therapy with vaccine driven divergent T‐cell response

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Myeloma patients frequently respond poorly to bacterial and viral vaccination. A few studies have reported poor humoral immune responses in myeloma patients to COVID‐19 vaccination. Using a prospective study of myeloma patients in the UK Rudy study cohort, we assessed humoral and interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) cellular immune responses to COVID‐19 vaccination post second COVID‐19 vaccine administration. We report data from 214 adults with myeloma ( n  = 204) or smouldering myeloma ( n  = 10) who provided blood samples at least three weeks after second vaccine dose. Positive Anti‐spike antibody levels (> 50 iu/ml) were detected in 189/203 (92.7%), positive IGRA responses were seen in 97/158 (61.4%) myeloma patients. Only 10/158 (6.3%) patients were identified to have both a negative IGRA and negative anti‐spike protein antibody response. In all, 95/158 (60.1%) patients produced positive results for both anti‐spike protein serology and IGRA. After adjusting for disease severity and myeloma therapy, poor humoral immune response was predicted by male gender. Predictors of poor IGRA included anti‐CD38/anti‐BCMA (B‐cell maturation antigen) therapy and Pfizer‐BioNTech vaccination. Further work is required to understand the clinical significance of divergent cellular response to vaccination.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.21.21265158: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: & RUDY LREC 17/SC/0501), an established online rare disease platform with online dynamic consent and patient reported data11. Recruitment: To ensure reaching our recruitment target rapidly, multiple pathways for recruitment were employed.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    immunomodulatory drugs - thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide; anti-CD38 antibody (daratumumab, Isatuximab); and anti-BCMA targeted treatment – (belantamab),
    anti-CD38
    suggested: None
    anti-BCMA
    suggested: None
    Laboratory assessments: Collected serum samples were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV2 nucleocapsid (N) or spike (S) protein.
    SARS-CoV2 nucleocapsid ( N
    suggested: None
    SARS-CoV2 N protein antibodies were measured by turbidimetry (Abbott), with samples that produced values of >1.4IU/ml considered to be positive.
    SARS-CoV2 N protein
    suggested: None
    SARS-CoV2 S protein antibodies were measured by turbidimetry (Abbott) (IgG serology only), with a cut-off value of 50IU/ml considered to be a positive result.
    SARS-CoV2 S protein
    suggested: (PhosphoSolutions Cat# CoV2-5G8, RRID:AB_2868396)
    We combined humoral and T cell outcomes responses to generate 4 independent groups: combined positive Anti-S antibody and IGRA reactivity compared with those with either Anti-S antibody or IGRA reactivity and those with double negative results.
    Anti-S
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV2 N protein antibodies were measured by turbidimetry (Abbott), with samples that produced values of >1.4IU/ml considered to be positive.
    Abbott
    suggested: (Abbott, RRID:SCR_010477)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    But a small proportion of patients (6%) are antibody and IGRA negative who require salvage strategies to Strengths and weaknesses of the study: The strength of the study is confirmation of an immune response in heterogeneously vaccinated patients with longer than recommended duration between first and second dose. Our humoral response results are comparable to data reported so far. We have generated a large dataset of T cell response alongside humoral response in myeloma patients. Our data has also been generated in a comparable demographic to the UK myeloma population. Studies use different platforms to generate both antibody and T cell results which makes direct comparability difficult. This dataset, although very reassuring, requires longitudinal follow up. Although further vaccine doses are planned for this patient population, attrition of immune response over time due to ongoing therapy or underlying disease is a concern. A major limitation of this study is the limited sample size of participants with poor humoral and T cell responses. Further, our study is limited by the missing data on chemotherapy and myeloma status from the clinical notes for all participants. We partially addressed this by adding self-reported myeloma status where clinical data were not required and when we compared using only clinical record data, the findings were similar. Therefore, further follow up to determine whether immune response wanes over time and whether use of particular therapies have...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.