Mapping genome variation of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide highlights the impact of COVID-19 super-spreaders

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

The human pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the major pandemic of the twenty-first century. We analyzed more than 4700 SARS-CoV-2 genomes and associated metadata retrieved from public repositories. SARS-CoV-2 sequences have a high sequence identity (>99.9%), which drops to >96% when compared to bat coronavirus genome. We built a mutation-annotated reference SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny with two main macro-haplogroups, A and B, both of Asian origin, and more than 160 sub-branches representing virus strains of variable geographical origins worldwide, revealing a rather uniform mutation occurrence along branches that could have implications for diagnostics and the design of future vaccines. Identification of the root of SARS-CoV-2 genomes is not without problems, owing to conflicting interpretations derived from either using the bat coronavirus genomes as an outgroup or relying on the sampling chronology of the SARS-CoV-2 genomes and TMRCA estimates; however, the overall scenario favors haplogroup A as the ancestral node. Phylogenetic analysis indicates a TMRCA for SARS-CoV-2 genomes dating to November 12, 2019, thus matching epidemiological records. Sub-haplogroup A2 most likely originated in Europe from an Asian ancestor and gave rise to subclade A2a, which represents the major non-Asian outbreak, especially in Africa and Europe. Multiple founder effect episodes, most likely associated with super-spreader hosts, might explain COVID-19 pandemic to a large extent.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.19.097410: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Alignment of SARS-CoV-2 genomes against the reference sequence was carried out using MUSCLE v3.8.31 program (Edgar 2004).
    MUSCLE
    suggested: (MUSCLE, RRID:SCR_011812)
    Interspecific alignment was carried out using MAFFT program (Katoh et al. 2002) with default parameters.
    MAFFT
    suggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)
    For this, we used the function cmdscale (library stats) from the statistical software R Project for Statistical Computing v. 3.3.1 (https://www.r-project.org/; (Team 2012)).
    R Project for Statistical
    suggested: (R Project for Statistical Computing, RRID:SCR_001905)
    The best maximum likelihood tree was visualized and edited using FigTree v.
    FigTree
    suggested: (FigTree, RRID:SCR_008515)
    The demography of SARS-CoV-2 sequences was inferred using the Extended Bayesian Skyline Plot method (EBSP) (Heled and Drummond 2008) implemented in BEAST v2.6.2 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007).
    BEAST
    suggested: (BEAST, RRID:SCR_010228)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.