The HEART-GP strategy for ruling out acute coronary syndrome in out-of-hours primary care: a diagnostic accuracy trial protocol

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition that must be rapidly identified to prevent morbidity and mortality. Differentiating ACS from benign conditions remains difficult in primary care settings due to non-specific and overlapping symptom profiles, and limited diagnostic resources. Current guidelines promote a low threshold for emergency department (ED) referral, resulting in referral rates of 40–70%. Despite this cautious approach, ACS cases are still missed, sometimes with serious consequences. The arrival of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-troponin) point-of-care testing (POCT) may enable safer, faster, and more efficient diagnosis in primary care settings.

Methods and analysis

This multicenter prospective diagnostic accuracy trial evaluates the HEART-GP strategy , combining a single fingerstick hs-troponin test with clinical assessment and optional ECG. Adults (≥18 years) presenting with acute chest pain or discomfort to one of four participating Dutch OOH-PC centers are eligible. The primary outcome is the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events a composite of death, ACS, or urgent revascularization within six weeks. Diagnostic safety (sensitivity, negative predictive value) and efficiency (ED referral reduction) will be compared against standard care. Secondary analyses will assess the value of sex-specific cut-offs and integration with existing risk scores (HEART, INTERCHEST, Marburg Heart Score).

Anticipated results

We anticipate that the HEART-GP strategy will demonstrate high diagnostic safety along with marked efficiency gains, with potential for reducing unnecessary ED referrals. If hs-POCT proves reliable, it could be implemented widely to improve the safety and efficiency of acute chest pain evaluation in pre-hospital care.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the CCMO (CIV-NL-22-11-041231, 11-03-2022) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the Amsterdam UMC (NL82428.000.22, 02-03-2023) and registered in the ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN11954040 ). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences, and stakeholder engagement to inform future diagnostic pathways in primary care.

Strengths and limitations of this study

Strengths

  • An innovative, pragmatic strategy for rapid rule-out of ACS

  • High external validity due to prospective, multi-center, real-world OOH-primary care design

  • Identification of the optimal strategy of various risk stratification approaches using hs-troponin testing

  • Blinded, independent adjudication of clinical outcomes

Limitations

  • Powered for the composite MACE, but not for the individual components: death, ACS, or urgent coronary revascularization

  • Despite the use of a (delayed) reference standard, complete avoidance of possible verification bias cannot be achieved

Article activity feed