Diagnostic Value of the Triglyceride-to-HDL Cholesterol Ratio for Assessing Insulin Resistance in Healthy Kazakh Adults

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction

The development of ethnic-specific reference values for β-cell secretion and insulin sensitivity requires simple and routinely available markers. The triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) is considered a surrogate marker of peripheral insulin resistance; however, its diagnostic thresholds for the Kazakh population have not yet been defined.

Materials and methods

A retrospective–prospective study was conducted in 100 apparently healthy Kazakh adults aged 18–70 years (42 ± 12 years; 56 women). Current fasting TG, HDL-C, glucose, and insulin levels were obtained in 2025, while archival lipid profiles from 2019–2024 were retrieved from the national electronic health system “Damumed”. The TG/HDL-C index was calculated; its diagnostic accuracy for insulin resistance (IR) was evaluated using ROC-curve analysis, and the optimal cutoff was determined by the Youden index.

Results

The median TG/HDL-C increased from 0.59 (0.42–1.09) in 2019–2024 to 0.71 (0.47–1.25) in 2025 (p < 0.001). The proportion of individuals with TG/HDL-C ≥ 3.0 rose from 2% to 4% of the sample. The correlation between TG/HDL-C and HOMA-IR was ρ = 0.46 (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.72 ± 0.06; the optimal cutoff of 1.1 provided 64% sensitivity and 79% specificity. A threshold ≥ 3.0 maintained 97% specificity with 9% sensitivity.

Discussion

The findings indicate a progressive increase in the atherogenicity of the lipid profile among apparently healthy Kazakh adults and confirm the utility of the TG/HDL-C index as a tool for early screening of insulin resistance. A cutoff of 1.0–1.2 is recommended as a practical criterion for use in primary health care, whereas a threshold ≥ 3.0 may serve as a highly specific marker warranting comprehensive metabolic evaluation. Automated calculation of the index for each lipid profile could facilitate the establishment of regional reference values for β-cell function and enable timely identification of individuals at elevated metabolic risk.

Article activity feed