Does Infarct Size Influence Gut Barrier Integrity and Bacterial Translocation after Experimental Stroke?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Ischemic stroke (IS) triggers brain injury and systemic changes, including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier dysfunction (IBD), and bacterial translocation (BT). Although larger infarcts are associated with higher infection risk, it is unclear whether lesion size directly influences gut barrier integrity or bacterial dissemination.

Methods

Male C57BL/6 mice underwent permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) proximally or distally to generate large or small infarcts. Seventy-two hours post-ischemia, infarct volume was measured by MRI, and BT was assessed in mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and lungs. ZO-1 and MMP9 expression were used to evaluate intestinal barrier integrity. Peripheral and central inflammation were assessed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence.

Results

Proximal MCAO produced larger infarcts than distal MCAO. The proportion of animals exhibiting BT was lower in distal MCAO, but this difference was not statistically significant. ZO-1 expression did not differ between groups, while MMP9 was increased only in animals with BT, independent of infarct size. BT was associated with more pronounced lymphopenia and enhanced microglial activation and T-cell infiltration in the brain. The composition of translocated bacteria was similar across groups.

Conclusions

Infarct size alone does not determine IBD or BT, although BT is linked to intestinal and cerebral inflammation. This study evaluates for the first time the effect of lesion magnitude on IBD and BT, highlighting the complex interplay between cerebral injury and gut–systemic interactions.

Article activity feed