CONCLAVE: CONsensus CLustering with Annotation-Validation Extrapolation for cyclic multiplexed immunofluorescence data

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

High-dimensional cyclic multiplexed immunofluorescence (cMIF) enables single-cell phenotyping within intact tissues. Cell annotations rely on a multi-step pipeline involving normalization, sampling, dimensionality reduction, and clustering, but the absence of standardized benchmarks for method selection—especially at the clustering stage—leads to inconsistent and less reproducible phenotyping. To address this, we developed CONCLAVE, a consensus-clustering-based workflow that optimizes upstream steps and integrates results from multiple clustering algorithms retaining only those cell labels supported by at least two independent methods. Through in-silico simulations and real-world cMIF datasets, CONCLAVE consistently outperformed single-clustering-method approaches in accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness, with improvements becoming more evident when mapped within spatial tissue contexts. Additionally, CONCLAVE includes a scoring module that flags regions likely to contain unreliable or inconsistent data, facilitating targeted quality control. In summary, CONCLAVE offers a robust framework for cell annotation in cMIF datasets, enhancing the reliability of downstream spatial proteomics analyses.

Article activity feed