Patient-Tailored Minimally Invasive Hybrid Ablation of Complex Ventricular Tachycardia Substrates
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Clinical experience with minimally invasive hybrid ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation remains limited, particularly regarding video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) access.
Objectives
To describe procedural characteristics, feasibility, and outcomes of minimally invasive hybrid VT ablation for complex substrates.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive hybrid VT ablation at a single tertiary center (2014–2025) were retrospectively analyzed. Multidisciplinary preprocedural evaluation was consistently performed, and from 2022 onward, this was formalized within the VT-TRACT (ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a multidisciplinary clinical-translational approach) care pathway.
Results
Twenty-two patients (86% male, median age 70 years, median PAINESD score 13, 68% VT storm) underwent minimally invasive hybrid VT ablation: left- or right-sided VATS (n=13 vs 1), subxiphoid access (n=3), double access (n=2), and anterolateral minithoracotomy (n=3). Indications were prior cardiac surgery in 7 (32%), extensive scar in 3 (14%), concomitant left-sided sympathectomy in 2 (9%) and hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation in 1 (5%), failed epicardial access in 2 (9%), pericarditis/tamponade in 2 (9%), while 5 (23%) underwent ablation under direct visualization by preference. Pericardial adhesions (45%) were bluntly dissected. Mean procedure time was 312±98 minutes. At one year, median VT burden decreased from 16.5 [9.5–37.0] to 0 [0–5.8] (−81%, P <0.001), and ICD shocks from 2 [0–5] to 0 [0–0] (−90%, P <0.001). One hemothorax required reoperation; no other major complications occurred. One-year survival was 82%.
Conclusions
Minimally invasive, patient-tailored hybrid VT ablation—guided by multidisciplinary planning—achieves marked reductions in VT burden and ICD shocks with a favorable safety profile, even in complex post-surgical patients.
