Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-based and AI-based Denoising
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose
Optimal diffusion MRI (dMRI) data for image denoising is often unavailable from scanner reconstruction. In this work, we make available an offline reconstruction pipeline for GE dMRI acquisitions, giving access to complex dMRI data. Furthermore, we compare the efficacy of GE HealthCare’s AIR-Recon DL™ (ARDL), a proprietary convolutional neural network-based reconstruction and denoising approach, to open-source PCA-based MPPCA SVS and NORDIC denoising methods on high-resolution dMRI data.
Methods
We developed an end-to-end offline dMRI reconstruction pipeline for GE HealthCare acquisitions, augmenting the Orchestra software development kit, and validated its output against scanner reconstruction. We used it to compare MPPCA SVS , NORDIC and ARDL denoising approaches, considering underlying metrics reflecting noise variance and bias, such as the ADC profiles in highly anisotropic areas, and downstream measurements, such as fiber orientation estimation and white matter tractography.
Results
Our validated offline reconstruction supports various in-plane/out-of-plane accelerations and partial Fourier reconstruction methods. Unlike scanner reconstruction, it provides access to complex dMRI data, enabling denoising in the complex domain, which demonstrated superior noise floor suppression compared to magnitude-constrained denoising. PCA-based denoising methods had improved spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise and more robust fiber orientation estimation compared to ARDL.
Conclusion
We found significant gains in dMRI data quality when using the proposed offline reconstruction pipeline, allowing complex-domain denoising to obtain high-quality data at high spatial resolution and b-value, using a wide-bore scanner and a standard PGSE EPI sequence. MPPCA SVS and NORDIC (4D PCA-based) outperformed ARDL (2D) in terms of spatial resolution, reduction of noise-floor bias and variance.
