Monitoring fatigue with consumer wearables in multiple sclerosis following rehabilitation: An observational study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Fatigue places a great burden on people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), but fatigue assessments are imperfect and rely on subjective surveys. Assessing digital biomarkers derived from wearable devices has shown promise as an objective measurement method. We investigate their association with fatigue with a special focus on within-person changes and differences between cognitive and motor fatigue. PwMS entering inpatient rehabilitation were recruited and equipped with a consumer-grade fitness watch (Fitbit Inspire HR). Participants were monitored during rehabilitation and four weeks after returning home. We used hierarchical modeling to assess cross-sectional associations between digital biomarkers and fatigue scores and linear models to investigate associations between change scores. In total, 45 PwMS were included in the study (61.7% female, mean age = 46.0 (SD = 8.9). Device wearing compliance was high at 92.0% and participants provided on average 51.6 days of recorded data. The assessed digital biomarkers were generally only weakly and non-significantly associated with fatigue. The strongest cross-sectional association with fatigue was found in intraday variability (b=-0.22, 95%CI = [-0.41, -0.02]), while step counts were most responsive to within-person changes in fatigue (b=-0.32, 95%CI = [-0.68, 0.05]). On average, effect sizes were 23.3% greater for change scores compared to cross-sectional associations and 62.9% greater for motor than for cognitive fatigue. Despite the very consistent data collection by participants, digital biomarkers did not show strong associations with fatigue in MS patients, suggesting general limitations of using consumer-grade wearables for fatigue assessments. We found some evidence that digital biomarkers are better suited to reflect within-person change than interpersonal differences. Additionally, digital biomarkers related more closely to motor than cognitive fatigue. Therefore, the most promising target for future research may be within-person changes in motor fatigue.

Article activity feed